Open Navigation

Conduct Outside of the Workplace

Can disciplinary action be taken for an employee’s conduct outside of work?

On occasions, conduct outside of the workplace can have a direct impact on the employment relationship. In such cases it is likely that this conduct may relied upon in disciplinary proceedings and ultimately to justify a decision to dismiss.

Conduct outside of the workplace

Generally speaking, an employees’ conduct outside of work is not grounds for dismissal.

ACAS guidance indicates that even criminal activity is not normally by itself a reason for disciplinary action. However, conduct outside the workplace may well be a fair reason to dismiss an employee. Employers will need to carefully consider the whether the conduct or activity would have an impact of the employee’s suitability to do the job, whether it impacts their relationship with their colleagues, clients or customers, and whether the conduct could result in reputational damage to the business. In reaching any decision to dismiss, employers will need to establish that they followed a fair procedure and that they acted reasonably by treating the conduct as a reason for dismissal (such as “some other substantial reason” or “misconduct”).

In situations where an employee has been charged or convicted with a serious or violent crime, the decision making process when taking disciplinary action may be fairly straight forward as the conduct would almost certainly have an impact on the employment relationship, or cause reputational damage.

Similarly, if an employee was found to have committed theft, this could certainly impact on the employment relationship as it calls into question the trustworthiness of the employee. This is even more significant in circumstances when the employee handles money or accounts, or if they work in a regulated environment.

A custodial sentence may also “frustrate” the employment contract, as simply speaking, the employee would not be able to do their job if they are in prison.

What happens if the conduct is a little less serious? If an employee is reported to have had a scuffle in a bar over the weekend, then whilst this behaviour is not acceptable, could it really have an impact on the employer relationship or the ability of the employee to do their job? Does the situation change if the “scuffle” occurred with another employee present (or involved), or during an alcohol- fuelled work event? What if the employee was a senior executive or “the face” of the business?  In order for a dismissal or disciplinary action to be fair, rather than having a blanket approach to certain conduct, the employer must consider each situation on its own facts.

Having said that, it is best practice for the contract of employment and/or the employee handbook to clearly stipulate what the employer deems misconduct or gross misconduct.

News

Clawback Clauses and UK Visa Fees: Part 1

The rising cost of visa sponsorship has generated renewed interest in the scope and enforceability of clawback clauses in employment contracts and secondment agreements.  Clawback clauses provide that an agreed sum must be repaid to the employer in the event that the individual either does not commence employment or does not remain in employment for…

Read More

Navigating the Stress of Moving Country: Strategies for Success

Moving to a new country can be one of life’s most exciting adventures, but it’s also undoubtedly one of the most stressful experiences one can undergo. Couple that with the complexities of the immigration process, and it’s easy to feel overwhelmed. April is Stress Awareness Month, a time to shine a light on the importance…

Read More

Spotlight on EMEA Series: Denmark

In our Spotlight on EMEA series we round up the latest developments from around the regions.  In this post we look at the extension of the Ukraine-Special Act in Denmark. The validity of residence permits issued by the The Danish Immigration Service that were granted under the Ukraine-Special Act, have been extended until 17 March…

Read More