Open Navigation

Without Prejudice Discussions

Negotiating a favourable outcome

Settlement agreements are legally binding contracts pursuant to which an employee waives their right to bring an employment claim (or claims) against their employer, usually in exchange for a severance payment or other favourable term, such as “good leaver” status or retaining stock awards to which they may otherwise not be entitled

Settlement agreements are commonly used as a means of resolving disputes between an employer and employee. In many circumstances, settlement agreements arise as a result of disputes during redundancy, capability or disciplinary process. Whilst they can be made at any stage of the employment relationship, and do not always result in a termination of it, settlement agreements are often proposed as a way of ending the relationship by mutual agreement.

Both the employer and employee will have demands they wish to be met in the agreement, looking for the “best deal” they can achieve, so there can be considerable negotiation place before the final terms are agreed. These negotiations typically take place on a ‘without prejudice’ basis. In a nutshell, this means that if negotiations break down, discussions around the settlement agreement (and indeed often the fact it was proposed) cannot be referred to in in litigation before an Employment Tribunal. However, there is a significant caveat to this rule: the ‘without prejudice’ doctrine only applies if there is an existing dispute between the employer and employee and the discussions are a genuine attempt to resolve that existing dispute. No dispute = no such protection.

Whether the circumstances amount to a “dispute” depend on the individual circumstances. For example, if there is no existing dispute, the fact that an employer states that a conversation, for example about poor performance and potential exit, is “without prejudice” does not make it so. However, if there is a genuine dispute, such as a breakdown in the relationship arising from discussions concerning poor performance, the conversation may well be protected. It can be a very fine line. Even, the fact an employee has raised a grievance may not always amount to a dispute of itself. It will depend on a number of factors including the contents of the grievance and whether the grievance would be upheld by the employer. The mere labelling of a conversation or document as “without prejudice” will certainly not make it so alone (although without prejudice documents should always be marked as such!)

News

Documents 3C Leave: A Landmark Judgment

What is Section 3C leave?  Section 3C is a section of the 1971 Immigration Act, the legislation which underpins the UK Immigration Rules. It applies to all visa applications (importantly, this means it does not apply to British Citizenship applications).   Where an in-time visa application is made to vary or extend leave to remain in…

Read More

Spotlight on EMEA Series: Saudi Arabia

In this post we highlight the requirements of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development (MHRSD) in Saudi Arabia urging all private sector businesses/employers to update the location data o their branches.  Updates are to be made via the ‘establishment location management’ service available through the Qiwa platform.   The updates to the establishment…

Read More

Spotlight on APAC Series: Thailand

In our Spotlight on APAC series we round up the latest immigration developments across the region.  In this post we focus on the changes to immigration opportunities for Thailand that became effective on 1 June 2024.   As part of a focused strategy to attract more tourism and long-term visitors to Thailand, the Government will…

Read More