Singapore’s Evolving Immigration Landscape: A Strategic Response to Local and Global Realities

In recent years, Singapore’s immigration policies have undergone significant transformations in response to shifting economic conditions, societal needs, and concerns about the local workforce. As a global hub for multinational corporations, the country has long relied on foreign talent to remain competitive.

However, balancing the influx of foreign workers with the interests of Singaporean employees has become increasingly complex. Key policy changes—such as the introduction of the Complementarity Assessment Framework (COMPASS) and adjustments to salary thresholds for various work passes—illustrate how Singapore’s immigration strategy has evolved to address these challenges.

This article explores how immigration policies have been shaped by the dynamic interplay between economic imperatives, political discourse, and the need to ensure fair competition for local workers. By examining these developments, it becomes clear that Singapore’s immigration policies are not static; rather, they are carefully calibrated to reflect prevailing conditions on the ground.

1. Introduction of COMPASS

The Complementarity Assessment Framework (COMPASS), introduced in 2022 and implemented from 2023, represents a strategic shift towards fostering a more balanced foreign workforce. This points-based system is designed to ensure that foreign professionals complement, rather than unfairly compete with, the local workforce.

By factoring in attributes such as qualifications, diversity, and support for local employment, COMPASS reflects Singapore’s nuanced approach to attracting foreign talent. It acknowledges the ongoing need for skills and innovation while also safeguarding opportunities for local professionals. Ultimately, COMPASS is a targeted, situational response to maintaining the right mix of foreign and local workers.

2. Salary Requirements and S Pass Adjustments

Since 2022, the government has progressively raised minimum qualifying salaries and levies for S Pass holders. These changes are tied to expectations for higher-skilled foreign workers and are benchmarked against the salaries of local workers in the top one-third income bracket.

Such adjustments signal a broader policy direction: immigration regulations are being realigned to support economic competitiveness, ensuring that foreign workers are only brought in when they meet the required skill levels and contribute meaningfully to the workforce.

3. Contextual Adjustments Over Time

Over the years, various modifications to the foreign workforce framework have been introduced in response to local concerns, including job displacement, skills mismatches, and the need for stronger safeguards for local workers.

Notable examples include the 2022 changes to the S Pass scheme, revised work permit quotas, and measures to encourage employers to be more selective in their hiring practices. These developments highlight the government’s ongoing efforts to adapt immigration policy in line with economic trends and public sentiment.

4. Skills Transfer and Job Displacement

Calls for greater safeguards around skills transfer and job displacement have become more prominent, particularly among opposition parties. These discussions reflect a growing awareness of the long-term implications of foreign labour policies on local employment prospects.

In response, the government has introduced tighter entry requirements and invested in upskilling initiatives such as SkillsFuture. These measures demonstrate a commitment to ensuring that Singaporeans are not left behind and that foreign talent contributes positively to the development of the local workforce.

Conclusion

Singapore’s evolving immigration policies—including the introduction of COMPASS, revised salary thresholds for foreign workers, and adjustments to work pass quotas—underscore the country’s pragmatic and adaptive approach to workforce management. These reforms are driven by the dual objectives of sustaining economic growth and ensuring fair opportunities for local workers.

By continually calibrating its immigration strategy, Singapore demonstrates how policy can respond effectively to both local realities and global economic demands.

Author