Open Navigation

Disciplinary Process

Addressing disciplinary allegations

Following an investigation if there is sufficient evidence to suggest that disciplinary action should be brought against an individual these allegations should be put to the individual in a clear and concise way so that the employee is fully aware of the issues raised against them. A carefully drafted letter following an investigation will save an employer trouble later on in the event that it imposes any sanctions following the outcome of the disciplinary action.

Notification

If there are potential disciplinary issues to be addressed with an employee following an investigation the employee should be notified of the allegations in writing and invited to a disciplinary hearing. The invitation should, at least:

  • Set out the alleged disciplinary matters;
  • Explain the possible consequences;
  • Give the date, time and place of the disciplinary meeting; and
  • Remind the employee that he has the right to be accompanied at the meeting.

Right to be Accompanied – In addition to rights under the employment contract or Trade Union / collective agreements, Section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999 provides that an employee has the right to be accompanied to disciplinary hearing by a companion. A companion may be a colleague or a Trade Union representative. This right only applies to a meeting at which a disciplinary sanction is to be imposed or confirmed. There is no right to be accompanied to an investigatory meeting. Legal representation at disciplinary hearings is not normally permitted. If an employee suffers from a disability it may be appropriate for him to be accompanied by another person by way of a ‘reasonable adjustment’ to the usual procedure.

Evidence – It is usually advisable that the employee be given the evidence that has been gathering in the course of the investigation, such as witness statements, unless there is a good reason not to for example that an employer has told a witness they can remain anonymous.

Disciplinary Hearing

A disciplinary hearing or meeting with the employee must be held without unreasonable delay. An independent chair person and note taker should be appointed to conduct the hearing and make a record of the meeting.

The purpose of the hearing is to give the employee the opportunity to ask questions and to explain matters from their perspective. They may also wish to submit their own evidence to support what they are saying. If the employee cannot attend the meeting, the employer must normally adjourn the meeting at least once. The ACAS code does recognise some instances in which it may be appropriate to proceed with the meeting without the employee, but these are rare.

If further investigations need to be carried out as a result of matters raised during the meeting then the employer should adjourn the meeting and carry these out. The level of investigation that is appropriate will depend on the circumstances in question.

Outcome

The employer must decide whether disciplinary action is justified. If the allegations are confirmed the employee will be issued with an appropriate written warning or dismissed based on the matters raised.

The ACAS Code recommends administering at least two warnings before dismissing an employee for misconduct unless the misconduct amounts to gross misconduct. Employees should be given at least one chance to improve before being issued with a final written warning.

The decision to dismiss the employee can only be taken by a manager who has authority to do so. The employee must be notified in writing of the dismissal without any unreasonable delay.

After the Meeting

The employer must decide whether disciplinary action is justified. If the misconduct is confirmed the employee will be issued with an appropriate written warning or dismissed.

The ACAS Code recommends administering at least two warnings before dismissing an employee for misconduct unless the misconduct amounts to gross misconduct. Employees should be given at least one chance to improve before being issued with a final written warning.

The decision to dismiss the employee can only be taken by a manager who has authority to do so. The employee must be notified in writing of the dismissal without any unreasonable delay.

News

Tier 2 Update

Changes to the Immigration rules – The T2G annual limit, PhD level occupations and the Shortage Occupation List Changes to the Tier 2 (General) annual limit and PhD level occupations The Tier 2 (General) category is a category used by sponsors/employers in the UK who are looking to recruit for a position that cannot be…

Read More

“Global Britain” to attract more top scientists

UK immigration policy continues to be under the microscope on the national and international stages with wholesale changes planned over the course of the next 18 months. Some small policy shifts have already started creeping in, with the Prime Minister outlining Home Office plans to offer “fast-track processes” for leading scientists applying for visas to…

Read More
Home Image

Outlook 2020

Election 2019 Outcome What does the result mean for immigration policy and Brexit in 2020? The 2019 General Election produced a decisive outcome, resulting in a conservative party majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. This means that the long period of political uncertainty is over and the future trajectory of Brexit, at…

Read More